This research is an exploratory study that is based on previous studies focusing on relationship between the doctors and the elderly cancer patients; moreover, the research focuses on the doctors' negative attitudes and discriminative behaviors towards the elderly cancer patients so that we may be able to suggest the ways to decrease the ageism.
Qualitative method and quantitative method were applied sequently. In this research, we practiced in-depth interviews with 8 doctors and then the surveys with 274 doctors. The in-depth interview questions were categorized depending on meaningful testimonies and the survey data were analyzed in the descriptive statistic analysis and paired t-test using PASW statistics 18.
Through the in-depth interviews, the following is observed: the doctors rarely notify the elderly cancer patients directly; the family members of patients avoids the doctors to do so; and the doctors even show different attitudes or discriminatory actions to the elderly. Based on the in-depth interview results, the questions on notifying methods of the diagnosis and how to explain for treatment were developed and performed as a survey. Through the survey, only 8.4% of the doctors reported they directly notify the elderly cancer patient; moreover, they also reported they provide less information on treatment, side-effects, prognosis, and medical cost to the elderly than the middle-aged.
This research not only discovered the presence of discrimination towards the elderly cancer patients but also suggested the causes of it. In order to resolve the phenomenon, doctors must consider individualized difference and variability of physiological function and should be aware of the psychological change after the cancer diagnosis to better communicate with them. Additionally, the social family culture which overprotects the elderly must be changed.
Doctors' experiences on disclosure of cancer diagnosis and treatment explanation to elderly cancer patients
| Category | Sub-category |
|---|---|
| Directly informing the younger adults | • The doctor informs the adults directly |
| who aware in right of self determination | • The younger adults aware in the right of self determination |
| • The doctor informs the truths the younger adult in oder to plan the future | |
| Informing the elder who has authority | • The elder has authority and the awareness in self determination |
| Asking the family to accompany with the | • The elder has hearing loss |
| elder due to hardship in conversation | • The elder has deterioration in comprehension |
| with the elder who comes alone | • The elder has deterioration in memorization |
| • The elder shows dementia or delirium | |
| • The doctor watches the countenance of the elder whether she/he is informed about the cancer diagnosis | |
| • The doctor calls the family to comprehend the family's intention | |
| The family's request to keep the cancer | • The family is not willing to inform the elder |
| diagnosis as a secret | • The family asks to secure the cancer diagnosis to their elders. |
| • The family worries the elder's renouncement in treatment | |
| • The family worries the loss of desire in living of the elder | |
| • The family members worry about the physical/financial burden in the process of treatment | |
| Following the demand of the family | • The doctor follows the demand of the family in a discontent matter |
| • The doctor informs the cancer diagnosis due to the family's insistence, who knows well about the character of the elder | |
| Persuading the family to inform the elder | • The doctor persuades the family to accompany in the process |
| about the cancer diagnosis | • The doctor persuades the family to talk to the patient himself or herself |
| • The elder needs to know in order to reorganize the rest of the time in his or her life | |
| • In order to deal with the side effect, the elder needs to know about the disease | |
| • The patient has the right to know about his or her condition | |
| Informing the elder about the cancer di- | • It is hard for the doctor to inform the elder that she/he is diagnosed of cancer |
| agnosis in a euphemistic way | • The doctor expresses in a euphemistic matter |
| • The doctor makes the patient understand in his or her level of consciousness | |
| • The doctor explains in a hopeful matter than the true condition | |
| Explaining differently in different ages | • The doctor explains thoroughly about the schedule and the side-effect of the treatment to younger |
| adults | |
| • The doctor informs more objectively and accurately about the prognosis and the side-effect of the treatment to an younger patient | |
| • The doctor denies to explain truth or tells in a hopeful matter to the elder | |
| • The doctor avoids to conversation about the financial matter |
Doctor's characteristics
| Characteristics | doctor (n = 274) | |
|---|---|---|
| Age, y | 41.11±8.46, 29–67 | |
| Gender | Male | 194 (70.8) |
| Female | 80 (29.2) | |
| Religion | Buddhism | 28 (10.3) |
| Catholic | 67 (24.6) | |
| Protestant | 82 (30.1) | |
| Others | 2 (0.8) | |
| None | 93 (34.2) | |
| Proportion of cancer patients among total patients | Less than 25% | 39 (14.2) |
| 25–50% | 33 (12.0) | |
| 50–75% | 47 (17.2) | |
| 75% and more | 155 (56.6) | |
| Proportion of elder among cancer patients | Less than 25% | 26 (9.5) |
| 25–50% | 57 (20.9) | |
| 50–75% | 137 (50.2) | |
| 75% and more | 53 (19.4) | |
| Education experience of geriatrics | No | 97 (35.4) |
| Yes | 177 (64.6) | |
| Career experience | Specialist career | 9.97±08.54, 0–36 |
How to inform cancer diagnosis at first (n = 274)
| Characteristics | n |
|---|---|
| I talk to the older person directly at first. | 23 (8.4) |
| I talk to spouse or adult children at first, and I make them talk to elder. | 51 (18.6) |
| I talk to spouse or adult children at first, and then I talk to elder. | 195 (71.2) |
| No answer. | 5 (1.8) |
| Total | 206 (100.0) |
Values are presented as n (%).
Comparison between the treatment explanations to older aged and middle aged in doctors
| Dimension | Doctor (n = 274) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Older aged | Middle aged | Paired |
||
| Treatment method and process | 3.87 (0.77) | 4.47 (0.60) | –13.14 | <0.001 |
| ide effect of treatment | 3.64 (0.81) | 4.34 (0.64) | –14.297 | <0.001 |
| Prognosis | 3.32 (0.87) | 4.22 (0.69) | –17.128 | <0.001 |
| Medical fee | 2.64 (0.88) | 3.42 (1.03) | –13.558 | <0.001 |
Values are presented as mean±SE. When comparing group differences, paired